Opinion dynamics and wisdom under out-group discrimination
نویسنده
چکیده
We study a DeGroot-like opinion dynamics model in which agents may oppose other agents. As an underlying motivation, in our setup, agents want to adjust their opinions to match those of the agents of their ‘in-group’ and, in addition, they want to adjust their opinions to match the ‘inverse’ of those of the agents of their ‘out-group’. Our paradigm can account for persistent disagreement in connected societies as well as biand multi-polarization. Outcomes depend upon network structure and the choice of deviation function modeling the mode of opposition between agents. For a particular choice of deviation function, which we call soft opposition, we derive necessary and sufficient conditions for long-run polarization. We also consider social influence (who are the opinion leaders in the network?) as well as the question of wisdom in our näıve learning paradigm, finding that wisdom is difficult to attain when there exist sufficiently strong negative relations between agents.
منابع مشابه
Opinion Dynamics and Wisdom under Conformity
We study a dynamic model of opinion formation in social networks. In our model, boundedly rational agents update opinions by averaging over their neighbors’ expressed opinions, but may misrepresent their own opinion by conforming or counter-conforming with their neighbors. We show that an agent’s social influence on the long-run group opinion is increasing in network centrality and decreasing i...
متن کامل(Failure of the) Wisdom of the crowds in an endogenous opinion dynamics model with multiply biased agents
We study an endogenous opinion (or, belief) dynamics model where we endogenize the social network that models the link (‘trust’) weights between agents. Our network adjustment mechanism is simple: an agent increases her weight for another agent if that agent has been close to truth (whence, our adjustment criterion is ‘past performance’). Moreover, we consider multiply biased agents that do not...
متن کاملExpertise and the Wisdom of Crowds: Whose Judgments to Trust and When
The Wisdom of Crowds describes the fact that aggregating a group’s estimate regarding unknown values is often a better strategy than selecting even an expert’s opinion. The efficacy of this strategy, however, depends on biases being nonsystematic and everyone being able to make a meaningful assessment. In situations where these conditions do not hold, expertise seems more likely to produce the ...
متن کاملPublic policy and the wisdom of crowds
Collective intelligence, or the wisdom of crowds, refers to a phenomenon by which, under the right conditions, groups of individuals can render highly accurate judgments. This phenomenon has long played an important role in economics, where understanding the behavior of groups is often essential to explaining economic outcomes. More recently, political scientists have shown that trends in publi...
متن کاملThe effectiveness of logotherapy on the wisdom and resilience of Escapee and Bad Caregivers’ Girls under the State Welfare Organization Care
The aim of this study was to investigate logotherapy on the resilience and wisdom of escapee and bad caregivers’ girls under the state welfare organization care. the research method was a quasi-experimental pretest-posttest with a control group. the statistical population of the study included all runaway or abused girls of the welfare organization in care centers in Tehran in the first half of...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Mathematical Social Sciences
دوره 80 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2016